<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1182 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411604</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found penalty orders under section 271(1)(c) for AYs 2008-09 to 2012-13 invalid due to vague notices lacking specificity. Relying on judicial precedents, penalties were deleted as the charges were not clearly communicated, rendering the proceedings unsustainable. All appeals by the assessee were allowed, and penalties were removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:23:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1182 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411604</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found penalty orders under section 271(1)(c) for AYs 2008-09 to 2012-13 invalid due to vague notices lacking specificity. Relying on judicial precedents, penalties were deleted as the charges were not clearly communicated, rendering the proceedings unsustainable. All appeals by the assessee were allowed, and penalties were removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411604</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>