<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1174 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411596</link>
    <description>Proof of service of the statutory notice and expiry of the 15-day waiting period are essential to complete an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, so a complaint filed before those requirements are satisfied is premature and cannot sustain a conviction. The statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 are rebuttable on a preponderance of probabilities, and an accused may rely on documentary material and surrounding circumstances to show a probable defence. On the stated record, the defence was accepted, the complainant failed to displace it, and the conviction was set aside with acquittal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:22:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1174 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411596</link>
      <description>Proof of service of the statutory notice and expiry of the 15-day waiting period are essential to complete an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, so a complaint filed before those requirements are satisfied is premature and cannot sustain a conviction. The statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 are rebuttable on a preponderance of probabilities, and an accused may rely on documentary material and surrounding circumstances to show a probable defence. On the stated record, the defence was accepted, the complainant failed to displace it, and the conviction was set aside with acquittal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>