https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411582 The appeal challenging the rejection for non-compliance with Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act due to a filing delay was dismissed. Despite arguments citing system unavailability, the appeal was filed beyond the stipulated period without valid justification. The Member upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the need for timely compliance and valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings to meet statutory requirements effectively. The decision highlights the importance of adhering to procedural timelines for appeals under the Central Excise Act. en-us Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:22:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411582 The appeal challenging the rejection for non-compliance with Section 35 F of the Central Excise Act due to a filing delay was dismissed. Despite arguments citing system unavailability, the appeal was filed beyond the stipulated period without valid justification. The Member upheld the dismissal, emphasizing the need for timely compliance and valid reasons for delays in legal proceedings to meet statutory requirements effectively. The decision highlights the importance of adhering to procedural timelines for appeals under the Central Excise Act. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411582