<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1155 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411577</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s prayer for amendment of the earlier application and upheld the respondent&#039;s objections regarding the validity of the MOU executed during the moratorium period and the determination of the insolvency commencement date. The Tribunal also clarified that the definition of an allottee under the IBC was clear prior to the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in the Manish Kumar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1155 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411577</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the applicant&#039;s prayer for amendment of the earlier application and upheld the respondent&#039;s objections regarding the validity of the MOU executed during the moratorium period and the determination of the insolvency commencement date. The Tribunal also clarified that the definition of an allottee under the IBC was clear prior to the Supreme Court&#039;s judgment in the Manish Kumar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411577</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>