<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1153 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411575</link>
    <description>Where no viable resolution plan emerges during the CIRP and the Committee of Creditors, by the requisite majority, declines extension, liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code becomes appropriate. The Resolution Professional and CoC had repeatedly attempted revival through expressions of interest and investor participation, but no workable plan was received. On that basis, the application for liquidation was found to comply with the Code, and the proposed Liquidator had given consent and was treated as provisionally eligible for appointment. The Corporate Debtor was accordingly directed to be liquidated and the Resolution Professional appointed as Liquidator.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:21:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1153 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , BENGALURU BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411575</link>
      <description>Where no viable resolution plan emerges during the CIRP and the Committee of Creditors, by the requisite majority, declines extension, liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code becomes appropriate. The Resolution Professional and CoC had repeatedly attempted revival through expressions of interest and investor participation, but no workable plan was received. On that basis, the application for liquidation was found to comply with the Code, and the proposed Liquidator had given consent and was treated as provisionally eligible for appointment. The Corporate Debtor was accordingly directed to be liquidated and the Resolution Professional appointed as Liquidator.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>