<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1141 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the sustained addition. It emphasized the importance of considering past GP rates when estimating income after rejecting books and highlighted the AO&#039;s duty to make a fair assessment based on all relevant factors. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding alleged bogus purchases and low gross profit were upheld, with the Tribunal criticizing the AO and CIT(A) for not adhering to the ITAT&#039;s previous decision and for failing to summon parties for confirming purchases. The estimated gross profit rate was also adjusted in favor of the appellant, resulting in the deletion of the additional amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:21:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1141 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the sustained addition. It emphasized the importance of considering past GP rates when estimating income after rejecting books and highlighted the AO&#039;s duty to make a fair assessment based on all relevant factors. The appellant&#039;s contentions regarding alleged bogus purchases and low gross profit were upheld, with the Tribunal criticizing the AO and CIT(A) for not adhering to the ITAT&#039;s previous decision and for failing to summon parties for confirming purchases. The estimated gross profit rate was also adjusted in favor of the appellant, resulting in the deletion of the additional amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>