<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1131 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411553</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer facing a duty dispute with the Revenue, regarding entitlement to interest on a delayed refund claim. The Tribunal determined that the appellant, who paid duty under protest and later received a refund without interest, was entitled to interest from the date of deposit till realization at a rate of 12% per annum. Citing decisions from various High Courts, the Tribunal set aside the initial order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that amounts paid under protest should be refunded with interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:20:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1131 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411553</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer facing a duty dispute with the Revenue, regarding entitlement to interest on a delayed refund claim. The Tribunal determined that the appellant, who paid duty under protest and later received a refund without interest, was entitled to interest from the date of deposit till realization at a rate of 12% per annum. Citing decisions from various High Courts, the Tribunal set aside the initial order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing that amounts paid under protest should be refunded with interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>