<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1498 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim the full deduction under section 80IC on profits from manufacturing stainless steel flats, including those from outsourced processes. The Tribunal rejected the application of section 80IA(10) to reduce the deduction, emphasizing a literal interpretation of section 80IC without additional conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1498 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to claim the full deduction under section 80IC on profits from manufacturing stainless steel flats, including those from outsourced processes. The Tribunal rejected the application of section 80IA(10) to reduce the deduction, emphasizing a literal interpretation of section 80IC without additional conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>