<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297329</link>
    <description>The Tribunal deemed the reopening of assessment under section 147 as valid due to the belief that income had escaped assessment. However, the Tribunal allowed the benefit of carrying forward unabsorbed depreciation beyond eight years, citing relevant judicial precedents and the amended provisions of section 32(2). As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed, directing the AO to permit the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation amounting to ? 23,69,592/- indefinitely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1411 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297329</link>
      <description>The Tribunal deemed the reopening of assessment under section 147 as valid due to the belief that income had escaped assessment. However, the Tribunal allowed the benefit of carrying forward unabsorbed depreciation beyond eight years, citing relevant judicial precedents and the amended provisions of section 32(2). As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partially allowed, directing the AO to permit the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation amounting to ? 23,69,592/- indefinitely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>