<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (12) TMI 1262 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297345</link>
    <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the deletion of Rs. 1.74 crores in lumpsum leasing charges, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. Both parties were permitted to raise all contentions, emphasizing the need for reevaluation of the substantial legal question in light of the unregistered lease issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2021 09:20:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (12) TMI 1262 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297345</link>
      <description>The High Court quashed the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the deletion of Rs. 1.74 crores in lumpsum leasing charges, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration. Both parties were permitted to raise all contentions, emphasizing the need for reevaluation of the substantial legal question in light of the unregistered lease issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>