<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (3) TMI 130 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297322</link>
    <description>Where a complainant in a private complaint case has a statutory right of appeal against acquittal under Section 417(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, revisional jurisdiction cannot be used as a substitute. Section 439(5) bars revision when an appeal lies and has not been brought by the party entitled to appeal. The expression &quot;such an order of acquittal&quot; in Section 417(3) is read to include both an original acquittal and an appellate acquittal by a court other than the High Court. The complainant must therefore pursue the statutory appeal, including special leave where required, rather than bypass that remedy in revision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 11:33:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (3) TMI 130 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297322</link>
      <description>Where a complainant in a private complaint case has a statutory right of appeal against acquittal under Section 417(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, revisional jurisdiction cannot be used as a substitute. Section 439(5) bars revision when an appeal lies and has not been brought by the party entitled to appeal. The expression &quot;such an order of acquittal&quot; in Section 417(3) is read to include both an original acquittal and an appellate acquittal by a court other than the High Court. The complainant must therefore pursue the statutory appeal, including special leave where required, rather than bypass that remedy in revision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>