<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 978 - KARNATAKA AT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297321</link>
    <description>Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was construed to cover a complainant&#039;s appeal against an acquittal passed by a court other than the High Court, whether the acquittal arose at trial or in appellate jurisdiction. Reading the phrase &quot;such an order of acquittal&quot; with Sections 378(1)(b) and 378(2)(b), the court held that excluding appellate acquittals would create an unwarranted distinction between complaint cases and police-report cases. The legal position was therefore stated in favour of maintainability of such appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 11:27:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654143" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 978 - KARNATAKA AT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297321</link>
      <description>Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was construed to cover a complainant&#039;s appeal against an acquittal passed by a court other than the High Court, whether the acquittal arose at trial or in appellate jurisdiction. Reading the phrase &quot;such an order of acquittal&quot; with Sections 378(1)(b) and 378(2)(b), the court held that excluding appellate acquittals would create an unwarranted distinction between complaint cases and police-report cases. The legal position was therefore stated in favour of maintainability of such appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>