https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411550 The Supreme Court acknowledged the well-intentioned nature of the High Court's directions but emphasized the importance of practical implementation. It noted that certain directives were beyond the State's capabilities and should be treated as advice rather than enforceable orders. The Court stressed the need for feasible measures to combat the pandemic effectively and raised concerns about the High Court's jurisdiction in issuing directives with national and international implications. The Court stayed the challenged order, appointing an Amicus Curiae to assist, and scheduled a future hearing to address the issues comprehensively. en-us Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:31:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411550 The Supreme Court acknowledged the well-intentioned nature of the High Court's directions but emphasized the importance of practical implementation. It noted that certain directives were beyond the State's capabilities and should be treated as advice rather than enforceable orders. The Court stressed the need for feasible measures to combat the pandemic effectively and raised concerns about the High Court's jurisdiction in issuing directives with national and international implications. The Court stayed the challenged order, appointing an Amicus Curiae to assist, and scheduled a future hearing to address the issues comprehensively. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 21 May 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411550