https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411549 The court declined to intervene in the petitioner's request for documents listed in Annexure-A, as the matter was already pending before respondent no.3. Regarding the challenge to the attachment of the bank account, the court upheld the attachment order issued under Section 67 of the Central GST Act, noting that the petitioner had already submitted objections. The court found no need to keep the petition pending or request a counter affidavit, directing respondent no.3 to provide a reasoned order on the objection within two weeks after granting a hearing to the petitioner. en-us Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411549 The court declined to intervene in the petitioner's request for documents listed in Annexure-A, as the matter was already pending before respondent no.3. Regarding the challenge to the attachment of the bank account, the court upheld the attachment order issued under Section 67 of the Central GST Act, noting that the petitioner had already submitted objections. The court found no need to keep the petition pending or request a counter affidavit, directing respondent no.3 to provide a reasoned order on the objection within two weeks after granting a hearing to the petitioner. Case-Laws GST Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411549