<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1119 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411541</link>
    <description>The excess recovery of service tax can only be demanded under Section 73-A of the Act, not Section 73. The computation of service tax demand should be based on figures from the balance sheets. The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked, and no penalty is imposable due to the absence of malafides. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654130" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1119 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411541</link>
      <description>The excess recovery of service tax can only be demanded under Section 73-A of the Act, not Section 73. The computation of service tax demand should be based on figures from the balance sheets. The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked, and no penalty is imposable due to the absence of malafides. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>