<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1103 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411525</link>
    <description>The court interpreted provisions under the DTVSV Act, determining the amount payable by the Petitioner as 50% of the disputed tax. It held that interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act cannot be added to the disputed tax under the DTVSV Scheme. The Designated Authority lacked jurisdiction to include interest in the disputed tax, requiring a fresh determination. The judgment clarified these issues and directed a new assessment of the disputed tax amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2021 08:29:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1103 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411525</link>
      <description>The court interpreted provisions under the DTVSV Act, determining the amount payable by the Petitioner as 50% of the disputed tax. It held that interest under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act cannot be added to the disputed tax under the DTVSV Scheme. The Designated Authority lacked jurisdiction to include interest in the disputed tax, requiring a fresh determination. The judgment clarified these issues and directed a new assessment of the disputed tax amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>