<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1260 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297320</link>
    <description>A registered security interest under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act takes priority over a later attachment by the Income-tax Department when the mortgage is created and registered first. Section 281 of the Income-tax Act is only a protective anti-alienation provision; it does not itself create a charge in favour of the Revenue or confer power on the tax authorities to declare title. Any challenge to the validity of a transfer must be pursued before the civil court, while the Tax Recovery Officer remains confined to attachment and recovery under the Second Schedule. On the stated facts, the bank&#039;s prior registered mortgage prevailed and the departmental attachment could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1260 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297320</link>
      <description>A registered security interest under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act takes priority over a later attachment by the Income-tax Department when the mortgage is created and registered first. Section 281 of the Income-tax Act is only a protective anti-alienation provision; it does not itself create a charge in favour of the Revenue or confer power on the tax authorities to declare title. Any challenge to the validity of a transfer must be pursued before the civil court, while the Tax Recovery Officer remains confined to attachment and recovery under the Second Schedule. On the stated facts, the bank&#039;s prior registered mortgage prevailed and the departmental attachment could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>