https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297316 The High Court declared the seizure order dated 07.02.2018 unconstitutional and in violation of procedural safeguards under Section 67(2) of the SGST Act. The Court found the authorization for seizure lacking credibility, rendering all consequential orders unsustainable. The petitioner's challenge was successful, granting liberty for fresh action by the respondents in compliance with legal procedures. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to due process and statutory requirements in executing seizures under the SGST Act. en-us Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Mar 2025 12:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297316 The High Court declared the seizure order dated 07.02.2018 unconstitutional and in violation of procedural safeguards under Section 67(2) of the SGST Act. The Court found the authorization for seizure lacking credibility, rendering all consequential orders unsustainable. The petitioner's challenge was successful, granting liberty for fresh action by the respondents in compliance with legal procedures. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to due process and statutory requirements in executing seizures under the SGST Act. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297316