<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1072 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411494</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order-in-original and directed the issuance of a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme. It held that the refusal based on subsequent transitional credit claims was beyond the Scheme&#039;s scope. The court also ruled that once the petitioner paid the amount as per the Scheme, adjudication proceedings under the Central Excise Act were invalid. However, the eligibility of transitional credit under the GST Act was upheld, remanding the matter for further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 16:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1072 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411494</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order-in-original and directed the issuance of a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme. It held that the refusal based on subsequent transitional credit claims was beyond the Scheme&#039;s scope. The court also ruled that once the petitioner paid the amount as per the Scheme, adjudication proceedings under the Central Excise Act were invalid. However, the eligibility of transitional credit under the GST Act was upheld, remanding the matter for further adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>