<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1047 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411469</link>
    <description>The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioners for offenses under Sections 276C(2) and 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the aggregate amount of tax, interest, and penalty involved was less than the threshold amount specified in the circular. The court concluded that prosecution was not warranted since the amount was below the specified limit of Rs. 10,000, as per the circular&#039;s provisions. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the proceedings in CC No.692/2015, and dismissed IA 1/2021.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=654003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1047 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411469</link>
      <description>The court quashed the proceedings against the petitioners for offenses under Sections 276C(2) and 277 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the aggregate amount of tax, interest, and penalty involved was less than the threshold amount specified in the circular. The court concluded that prosecution was not warranted since the amount was below the specified limit of Rs. 10,000, as per the circular&#039;s provisions. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashed the proceedings in CC No.692/2015, and dismissed IA 1/2021.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>