<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1035 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411457</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition made by the AO was unsustainable. The assessee&#039;s method of accounting for the subsidy and amortizing project expenses was in line with the CBDT Circular and accounting standards. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1035 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411457</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition made by the AO was unsustainable. The assessee&#039;s method of accounting for the subsidy and amortizing project expenses was in line with the CBDT Circular and accounting standards. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>