<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411454</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the delay in approving the gratuity scheme did not warrant disallowance as the employer had no control over the fund. The assessee&#039;s contributions to the fund were deemed legitimate, and the deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653984" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1032 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411454</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, deleting the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that the delay in approving the gratuity scheme did not warrant disallowance as the employer had no control over the fund. The assessee&#039;s contributions to the fund were deemed legitimate, and the deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>