<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1946 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297286</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional. The Committee of Creditors rejected a resolution plan, leading to liquidation due to non-compliance. An extension request for plan submission was denied, resulting in liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional was appointed as Liquidator with responsibilities for the liquidation process. The Tribunal emphasized timely fee payment and enforcement of personal guarantees by financial creditors. Payment priority for IRP and liquidation costs was highlighted, ensuring compliance with insolvency laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1946 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297286</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, appointing an Interim Resolution Professional. The Committee of Creditors rejected a resolution plan, leading to liquidation due to non-compliance. An extension request for plan submission was denied, resulting in liquidation of the Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional was appointed as Liquidator with responsibilities for the liquidation process. The Tribunal emphasized timely fee payment and enforcement of personal guarantees by financial creditors. Payment priority for IRP and liquidation costs was highlighted, ensuring compliance with insolvency laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>