https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297295 The Tribunal rejected the application challenging the ex-parte order under Section 7 of the IBC. Despite the CD's claims of improper notice service and Covid-19 restrictions, the Tribunal found that the notice was validly served via email, and the CD failed to respond, leading to the ex-parte order. Emphasizing the validity of electronic notice service, the Tribunal held it lacked authority to set aside its own order, dismissing the application without costs due to the CD's failure to demonstrate legal grounds for setting aside the order. en-us Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:47:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297295 The Tribunal rejected the application challenging the ex-parte order under Section 7 of the IBC. Despite the CD's claims of improper notice service and Covid-19 restrictions, the Tribunal found that the notice was validly served via email, and the CD failed to respond, leading to the ex-parte order. Emphasizing the validity of electronic notice service, the Tribunal held it lacked authority to set aside its own order, dismissing the application without costs due to the CD's failure to demonstrate legal grounds for setting aside the order. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 09 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297295