<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1857 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297294</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the review petition as barred by delay, treating the delay in filing as an independent ground that prevented the petition from being entertained and no condonation was granted. It also examined the merits and found no basis to interfere with the earlier decision, so the review failed on substantive grounds as well. The proceeding therefore ended in dismissal both for delay and, alternatively, on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1857 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297294</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the review petition as barred by delay, treating the delay in filing as an independent ground that prevented the petition from being entertained and no condonation was granted. It also examined the merits and found no basis to interfere with the earlier decision, so the review failed on substantive grounds as well. The proceeding therefore ended in dismissal both for delay and, alternatively, on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>