<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (6) TMI 1225 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297292</link>
    <description>Continuous service against regular vacancies, followed by later regularisation, was treated as qualifying service for pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 because qualifying service runs from the first appointment and the initial appointment could not be ignored merely due to delayed regularisation. On the same factual basis, the pre-regularisation period was also counted for annual increments, as the employees had continuously discharged duties throughout that tenure and their service could not be excluded from service benefits. The petitions accordingly succeeded, and the pre-regularisation service was directed to count for pensionary and increment benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:47:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (6) TMI 1225 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297292</link>
      <description>Continuous service against regular vacancies, followed by later regularisation, was treated as qualifying service for pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 because qualifying service runs from the first appointment and the initial appointment could not be ignored merely due to delayed regularisation. On the same factual basis, the pre-regularisation period was also counted for annual increments, as the employees had continuously discharged duties throughout that tenure and their service could not be excluded from service benefits. The petitions accordingly succeeded, and the pre-regularisation service was directed to count for pensionary and increment benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>