https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297296 Where an insolvency admission order is pronounced in open court and uploaded on the Tribunal's website, non-receipt of separate intimation does not justify exclusion of the entire intervening period from CIRP or retrospective shifting of the commencement date, because the order is treated as publicly available and the professional is expected to monitor the case after consenting to act. However, the Covid-19 lockdown period from 25.03.2020 to 30.06.2020 was excluded from the CIRP period under Regulation 40C of the Corporate Persons Insolvency Resolution Process Regulations, and the resolution process was directed to continue accordingly. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Aug 2021 08:47:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297296 Where an insolvency admission order is pronounced in open court and uploaded on the Tribunal's website, non-receipt of separate intimation does not justify exclusion of the entire intervening period from CIRP or retrospective shifting of the commencement date, because the order is treated as publicly available and the professional is expected to monitor the case after consenting to act. However, the Covid-19 lockdown period from 25.03.2020 to 30.06.2020 was excluded from the CIRP period under Regulation 40C of the Corporate Persons Insolvency Resolution Process Regulations, and the resolution process was directed to continue accordingly. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 01 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297296