https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297282 The High Court upheld the lower courts' decisions that the contracts were void due to the Defendant's minority status and estate management. It also rejected the applicability of Sections 65 and 68 of the Indian Contract Act. The contention regarding the repugnancy of Notification No. 85 to Article 14 was dismissed. The judgment emphasized the legal principles surrounding the void nature of contracts entered into by minors or during estate management and the inability to ratify such contracts upon attaining majority. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:56:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297282 The High Court upheld the lower courts' decisions that the contracts were void due to the Defendant's minority status and estate management. It also rejected the applicability of Sections 65 and 68 of the Indian Contract Act. The contention regarding the repugnancy of Notification No. 85 to Article 14 was dismissed. The judgment emphasized the legal principles surrounding the void nature of contracts entered into by minors or during estate management and the inability to ratify such contracts upon attaining majority. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Feb 1953 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297282