https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297281 A disability imposed on a proprietor under Court of Wards legislation was treated as a personal incapacity, so it continued to affect transactions relating to ward property even where the property lay outside the local limits of the enactment. Applying that principle, the contract concerning the Cawnpore house was held incompetent. The estate of a ward was also held to vest as a whole in the Court of Wards unless specific property was reserved, and the absence of a separate listing did not prevent vesting. On the facts, the house in suit formed part of the ward estate and remained under the Court's superintendence. en-us Wed, 10 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521 Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:54:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297281 A disability imposed on a proprietor under Court of Wards legislation was treated as a personal incapacity, so it continued to affect transactions relating to ward property even where the property lay outside the local limits of the enactment. Applying that principle, the contract concerning the Cawnpore house was held incompetent. The estate of a ward was also held to vest as a whole in the Court of Wards unless specific property was reserved, and the absence of a separate listing did not prevent vesting. On the facts, the house in suit formed part of the ward estate and remained under the Court's superintendence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 10 Dec 1902 00:00:00 +0521 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297281