<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1026 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411448</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 11,05,51,000/- as unaccounted on-money payment for the purchase of land. The Tribunal ruled that the proceedings initiated under section 153C of the Income Tax Act were invalid due to lack of incriminating evidence linking the assessee to the alleged payment, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:11:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1026 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411448</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 11,05,51,000/- as unaccounted on-money payment for the purchase of land. The Tribunal ruled that the proceedings initiated under section 153C of the Income Tax Act were invalid due to lack of incriminating evidence linking the assessee to the alleged payment, in line with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411448</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>