<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1021 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411443</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, finding no infirmity in the order. The adjudicating authority correctly processed the refund application by taking the net ITC, the FOB value as the total turnover of zero-rated supply, and the adjusted total turnover in compliance with the provisions of law. The appeal was rejected, and the original order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1021 - COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411443</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s decision, finding no infirmity in the order. The adjudicating authority correctly processed the refund application by taking the net ITC, the FOB value as the total turnover of zero-rated supply, and the adjusted total turnover in compliance with the provisions of law. The appeal was rejected, and the original order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>