<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1020 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411442</link>
    <description>The judgment determined that the activities conducted by the Applicant&#039;s Head Office located outside India and provided to the Applicant, a Liaison Office, do not constitute a supply under the CGST Act, 2017. As the Applicant is not engaged in any business activities, the services received are not subject to GST. Consequently, the Applicant is not obligated to register under Section 24 of the CGST Act for the services received from the Head Office.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1020 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411442</link>
      <description>The judgment determined that the activities conducted by the Applicant&#039;s Head Office located outside India and provided to the Applicant, a Liaison Office, do not constitute a supply under the CGST Act, 2017. As the Applicant is not engaged in any business activities, the services received are not subject to GST. Consequently, the Applicant is not obligated to register under Section 24 of the CGST Act for the services received from the Head Office.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>