<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1017 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411439</link>
    <description>The AAR ruled that the reimbursement by the industry partner to YAS of the stipend paid to students does not attract GST. The questions regarding the reimbursement of insurance premiums and expenses for uniforms and safety shoes were withdrawn by the applicant and hence were not addressed by the AAR.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1017 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411439</link>
      <description>The AAR ruled that the reimbursement by the industry partner to YAS of the stipend paid to students does not attract GST. The questions regarding the reimbursement of insurance premiums and expenses for uniforms and safety shoes were withdrawn by the applicant and hence were not addressed by the AAR.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>