https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411428 Writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy, and allegations of natural justice breach do not by themselves justify direct recourse to Article 226 absent imminent threat or gross injustice. The appellate authority is the proper final fact-finding forum, and disputes requiring examination of original records, invoices, returns, movement of goods, or payment mode should be pursued in appeal. The record showed notice, written reply and personal hearing, so there was no complete denial of hearing. The petitioner was granted liberty to file the statutory appeal, with delay to be condoned if needed and the appeal decided on merits expeditiously. en-us Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:10:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411428 Writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the statutory appellate remedy, and allegations of natural justice breach do not by themselves justify direct recourse to Article 226 absent imminent threat or gross injustice. The appellate authority is the proper final fact-finding forum, and disputes requiring examination of original records, invoices, returns, movement of goods, or payment mode should be pursued in appeal. The record showed notice, written reply and personal hearing, so there was no complete denial of hearing. The petitioner was granted liberty to file the statutory appeal, with delay to be condoned if needed and the appeal decided on merits expeditiously. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411428