<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1003 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411425</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner failed to establish the conditions required for the waiver of interest under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act. The rejection order was deemed legally sustainable, with the petitioner&#039;s claims of non-cooperation and genuine hardship not substantiated. The court highlighted the necessity of complying with tax demands and clarified that the interest charged under the Act is compensatory, not penal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2021 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1003 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411425</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition as the petitioner failed to establish the conditions required for the waiver of interest under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act. The rejection order was deemed legally sustainable, with the petitioner&#039;s claims of non-cooperation and genuine hardship not substantiated. The court highlighted the necessity of complying with tax demands and clarified that the interest charged under the Act is compensatory, not penal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>