<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 994 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411416</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of complying with the law and submitting relevant details. The assessee was granted the opportunity to substantiate their eligibility for the deduction, highlighting the principle of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:09:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653879" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 994 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411416</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the AO to re-examine the claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(iii) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2011-12. The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s decision due to insufficient evidence provided by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of complying with the law and submitting relevant details. The assessee was granted the opportunity to substantiate their eligibility for the deduction, highlighting the principle of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>