<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 983 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411405</link>
    <description>Trading loss supported by audited books, bills, vouchers and banking entries cannot be treated as bogus merely on suspicion or market volatility; in the absence of specific defects, suppression of consideration or proof of sham transactions, the loss disallowance was deleted. Interest expenditure linked to alleged diversion of borrowed funds to interest-free advances depends on whether sufficient own and interest-free funds were available; where such funds are sufficient, a presumption arises that the advances came from those funds, but the factual fund position required verification, so the issue was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 983 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411405</link>
      <description>Trading loss supported by audited books, bills, vouchers and banking entries cannot be treated as bogus merely on suspicion or market volatility; in the absence of specific defects, suppression of consideration or proof of sham transactions, the loss disallowance was deleted. Interest expenditure linked to alleged diversion of borrowed funds to interest-free advances depends on whether sufficient own and interest-free funds were available; where such funds are sufficient, a presumption arises that the advances came from those funds, but the factual fund position required verification, so the issue was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>