<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1212 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297265</link>
    <description>The court quashed and set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for proper consideration without influence from prior observations. Emphasizing consistency in legal decisions, the judges allowed the appeal based on a similar case&#039;s reasoning. The focus was on addressing legal issues without imposing costs, ensuring justice based on merits rather than procedural aspects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:06:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1212 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297265</link>
      <description>The court quashed and set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order, restoring the appeal for proper consideration without influence from prior observations. Emphasizing consistency in legal decisions, the judges allowed the appeal based on a similar case&#039;s reasoning. The focus was on addressing legal issues without imposing costs, ensuring justice based on merits rather than procedural aspects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>