<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1007 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by quashing the reassessment proceedings due to inadequate reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer. Grounds 2 and 3 were upheld, while grounds 1, 4 to 7 were dismissed. The addition of Rs. 20 lakhs under Section 68 and commission payment of Rs. 3,600 were nullified as the reassessment was annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:06:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1007 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by quashing the reassessment proceedings due to inadequate reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer. Grounds 2 and 3 were upheld, while grounds 1, 4 to 7 were dismissed. The addition of Rs. 20 lakhs under Section 68 and commission payment of Rs. 3,600 were nullified as the reassessment was annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>