<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 46 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26385</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were valid. The court emphasized that the Income-tax Officer had properly terminated the initial assessment proceedings against the assessee, and the failure to make a best judgment assessment did not affect the validity of the reassessment. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction was questioned for examining completed assessment proceedings. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the court concluded that the reassessment conducted by the Income-tax Officer was lawful, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:17:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=65383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 46 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26385</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that the reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were valid. The court emphasized that the Income-tax Officer had properly terminated the initial assessment proceedings against the assessee, and the failure to make a best judgment assessment did not affect the validity of the reassessment. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction was questioned for examining completed assessment proceedings. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the court concluded that the reassessment conducted by the Income-tax Officer was lawful, dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals and directing each party to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>