<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 873 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297244</link>
    <description>Wilful default under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act requires a conscious, deliberate and intentional failure to pay rent. The tenant&#039;s long record of regular payment, the existence of a genuine dispute over rent enhancement, and the fact that the eviction petition was filed before the two-month period in the Explanation had expired were treated as indicating that the default had not matured into wilful default when proceedings began. The tenant&#039;s deposit under Section 11 further supported the absence of deliberate contumacy, and the eviction order could not be sustained on that footing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:46:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 873 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297244</link>
      <description>Wilful default under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act requires a conscious, deliberate and intentional failure to pay rent. The tenant&#039;s long record of regular payment, the existence of a genuine dispute over rent enhancement, and the fact that the eviction petition was filed before the two-month period in the Explanation had expired were treated as indicating that the default had not matured into wilful default when proceedings began. The tenant&#039;s deposit under Section 11 further supported the absence of deliberate contumacy, and the eviction order could not be sustained on that footing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>