https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411392 The Court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge the final order of the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAPA) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as they were not found guilty of any violation. Consequently, the petitioner was dropped from the proceedings, and the notice for proof of payment of alleged profiteering amount was withdrawn. The Court clarified that this decision did not impact any inference against the company. The writ petition was disposed of by dropping the petitioner from the related case proceedings. en-us Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411392 The Court held that the petitioner lacked locus standi to challenge the final order of the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAPA) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as they were not found guilty of any violation. Consequently, the petitioner was dropped from the proceedings, and the notice for proof of payment of alleged profiteering amount was withdrawn. The Court clarified that this decision did not impact any inference against the company. The writ petition was disposed of by dropping the petitioner from the related case proceedings. Case-Laws GST Mon, 16 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411392