<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411386</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings were unsustainable due to a vague notice issued by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also found no justification for the penalty based on the erroneous invocation of Explanation 7 without conscious suppression by the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, directing the deletion of the penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:15:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653775" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 964 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411386</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty proceedings were unsustainable due to a vague notice issued by the Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal also found no justification for the penalty based on the erroneous invocation of Explanation 7 without conscious suppression by the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, directing the deletion of the penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>