<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 960 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that further examination was required for all issues presented in the case regarding service tax demands under joint venture agreements, income from telephone recharge, jurisdictional issues, and the classification of the difference amount from telephone recharge as commission subject to service tax. The Tribunal noted deficiencies in legal analysis and the need for detailed verification, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a comprehensive review and decision on the liabilities involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2021 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653771" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 960 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that further examination was required for all issues presented in the case regarding service tax demands under joint venture agreements, income from telephone recharge, jurisdictional issues, and the classification of the difference amount from telephone recharge as commission subject to service tax. The Tribunal noted deficiencies in legal analysis and the need for detailed verification, remanding the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for a comprehensive review and decision on the liabilities involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=411382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>