https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26376 The court held that the Tribunal erred in law by making observations on the merits of the case after deeming the appeals incompetent. It directed the removal of the portion of the Tribunal's order regarding tenants' rights under section 269-I of the Act. The court partially allowed the appeals, maintaining the order in all other respects and clarifying that its decision did not assess the correctness of the Tribunal's view on appeal maintainability. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. en-us Mon, 01 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Aug 2023 17:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26376 The court held that the Tribunal erred in law by making observations on the merits of the case after deeming the appeals incompetent. It directed the removal of the portion of the Tribunal's order regarding tenants' rights under section 269-I of the Act. The court partially allowed the appeals, maintaining the order in all other respects and clarifying that its decision did not assess the correctness of the Tribunal's view on appeal maintainability. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 01 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=26376