<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1759 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the transactions in question were genuine and conducted in the normal course of business. It found that the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing the loss claim based on selective scrutiny and unsupported assumptions. The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming that the losses incurred were genuine and not aimed at tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:12:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1759 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the transactions in question were genuine and conducted in the normal course of business. It found that the Assessing Officer erred in disallowing the loss claim based on selective scrutiny and unsupported assumptions. The Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and allowed the appeal of the assessee, confirming that the losses incurred were genuine and not aimed at tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>