<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1272 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297234</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Interlocutory Application, stating that the Applicants&#039; reliefs were previously denied, and the Board&#039;s decisions on the Managing Director&#039;s removal were within their corporate governance rights. The Tribunal emphasized it cannot substitute its judgment for the Board&#039;s unless there is a clear legal violation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:12:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1272 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297234</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Interlocutory Application, stating that the Applicants&#039; reliefs were previously denied, and the Board&#039;s decisions on the Managing Director&#039;s removal were within their corporate governance rights. The Tribunal emphasized it cannot substitute its judgment for the Board&#039;s unless there is a clear legal violation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>