<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297220</link>
    <description>Broad rule-making power under the Coir Industry Act, 1953 was held to permit a quantitative test for registration and licensing of exporters, because the statute did not exclude that regulatory criterion and committee recommendations did not limit the authority&#039;s discretion. The trade regulation was also upheld as a reasonable restriction in the public interest under Articles 19 and 14: the quantitative test was treated as a permissible control measure, and the classification of exporters on prescribed capacity and status was supported by intelligible differentia and a rational connection to preventing malpractices and improving the industry. Exemptions for cooperative societies further supported the validity of the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=653716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (12) TMI 50 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297220</link>
      <description>Broad rule-making power under the Coir Industry Act, 1953 was held to permit a quantitative test for registration and licensing of exporters, because the statute did not exclude that regulatory criterion and committee recommendations did not limit the authority&#039;s discretion. The trade regulation was also upheld as a reasonable restriction in the public interest under Articles 19 and 14: the quantitative test was treated as a permissible control measure, and the classification of exporters on prescribed capacity and status was supported by intelligible differentia and a rational connection to preventing malpractices and improving the industry. Exemptions for cooperative societies further supported the validity of the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>