https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297215 The validating enactment operated retrospectively to substitute a single acquisition regime for competing procedures and to validate past Bangalore improvement acquisitions made under the Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Its non-obstante and deeming provisions displaced the contrary effect of the City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 and authorised pending proceedings to continue under the land acquisition law. As a result, objections based on failure to follow Chapter III of the Improvement Act and alleged discrimination between classes of acquisitions failed, because the Legislature could retrospectively remove the source of differentiation. The challenge based on absence of public purpose was also not entertained after issue of the Section 6 notification. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Aug 2021 18:17:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297215 The validating enactment operated retrospectively to substitute a single acquisition regime for competing procedures and to validate past Bangalore improvement acquisitions made under the Mysore Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Its non-obstante and deeming provisions displaced the contrary effect of the City of Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945 and authorised pending proceedings to continue under the land acquisition law. As a result, objections based on failure to follow Chapter III of the Improvement Act and alleged discrimination between classes of acquisitions failed, because the Legislature could retrospectively remove the source of differentiation. The challenge based on absence of public purpose was also not entertained after issue of the Section 6 notification. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Dec 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297215