https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297206 The Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 and the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 were construed as complementary planning statutes operating together in Chandigarh's periphery area, because both pursue orderly development and the periphery regime is regulatory rather than an absolute bar on construction. The project was not interdicted solely on alleged inconsistency with Chandigarh's planning vision or on pending environmental and wildlife clearances, since those statutory approvals remained for the competent authorities to decide. Future progress of the project was held to depend on compliance with all applicable permissions, controls, and clearances. en-us Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Aug 2021 13:09:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297206 The Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control Act, 1952 and the Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 were construed as complementary planning statutes operating together in Chandigarh's periphery area, because both pursue orderly development and the periphery regime is regulatory rather than an absolute bar on construction. The project was not interdicted solely on alleged inconsistency with Chandigarh's planning vision or on pending environmental and wildlife clearances, since those statutory approvals remained for the competent authorities to decide. Future progress of the project was held to depend on compliance with all applicable permissions, controls, and clearances. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 26 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=297206